Your analysts work the intelligence: triaging it, questioning it and mapping it against the frameworks they already use.
chat answers carry the intelligence they came from, or say they cannot
across questions the corpus cannot answer
vulnerability decisions follow the published coordinator tree
Investigate, escalate, bookmark or dismiss, individually or across a selection, with escalations and investigations visible to the whole team.
Chat scoped to your own reports and feeds. Every answer cites the sources behind it, and when your corpus cannot answer, it says so instead of inventing something.
See which techniques are actually appearing in your intelligence, and which tactics your reporting is not touching.
Threat actor profiles cross-referenced against MITRE ATT&CK® and MISP Galaxy, with relationships explorable on a link-analysis canvas.
CISA SSVC decisions over the KEV catalogue and EPSS scores, personalised through your requirements, so a globally routine CVE can be an Act decision for you.
Record kill chains as intrusions actually unfolded, and build intelligence-grounded tabletop scenario documents from real reporting.
The ATT&CK view measures what has been observed in your intelligence. It is not a measure of defensive control coverage or detection readiness, and we will not present it as one. Those are different claims, and conflating them is how a dashboard misleads the person relying on it.
The fastest way to judge an intelligence platform is to point it at what you actually need to know.
