How findings are grounded in their sources, how collection stays healthy, and how your data is protected.
A claim you cannot trace is a claim you have to take on faith. Every factual statement in a report traces back to the source it came from.
Follow any finding to the original intelligence and see exactly where it came from.
Before a report is finished its facts are checked against its sources. Anything that doesn't trace back, such as an invented CVE or an unsupported attribution, is held for review rather than published.
We evaluate our own extraction and analysis against a labelled benchmark and hold the pipeline to it. Accuracy is something we measure, not an adjective.
Entity extraction, requirement routing, retrieval, citation faithfulness and answer quality each have a hand-labelled benchmark held in the codebase.
Each one carries a regression floor and runs in continuous integration. A change that degrades accuracy fails the build rather than shipping quietly.
Our prioritisation is tested against the published CISA coordinator decision table, so the reasoning matches a public standard rather than a private one.
Current scores, sample sizes and method go to security reviewers in technical due diligence. We would rather discuss a number with its denominator than print it without.
A source count is easy to put on a slide. Keeping those sources actually flowing is the harder part, and it decides whether a gap in your coverage is one you can see.
Feeds move, change format or go quiet. Source health is monitored and degradation is flagged, so a silently broken feed never becomes a silent gap.
Every source is tracked for reliability, not just counted. Failing or low-value sources are surfaced and managed.
Every organisation's data lives in its own isolated database schema. Your requirements, reports, notes and files are never visible to another tenant.
Data encrypted in transit (TLS 1.3) and at rest (AES-256). Keys and credentials stored using environment-level encryption.
Role-based access within each tenant: owners, admins and analysts see and do only what their role allows.
Conundrum aligns with the major cybersecurity and data-protection standards regulated organisations face, and maps your intelligence workflow to the evidence they ask for.
