ICRM
Conundrum isn't quite like a typical Threat Intelligence Platform. It's better described as a new class of tooling: an ICRM platform — purpose-built around your Prioritised Intelligence Requirements, treating collection as a resource you direct and account for, not a firehose you subscribe to.
Traditional threat intelligence platforms are built around aggregation: more feeds, more indicators, more volume. The hard problems sit elsewhere.
Generic feeds tell every subscriber the same thing. What matters to a regional bank is noise to a hospital — and without your priorities driving collection, most of what arrives is someone else's intelligence.
A million indicators answer no questions. Someone still has to turn raw collection into finished intelligence: what happened, who's behind it, whether it matters to you, and what to do about it.
Feeds break, move, and go quiet — usually silently. When nobody manages sources as a resource, a dead feed becomes an invisible gap in your coverage that nobody notices until it matters.
ICRM operationalises the discipline intelligence teams have always used — requirements first, collection directed, analysis grounded, dissemination deliberate.
Your Priority Intelligence Requirements — the questions your organisation actually needs answered — drive what is collected, what is prioritised, and what is filtered out. Industry-specific PIR libraries get you started; your team refines from there.
Continuous OSINT collection across curated sources, matched against your PIRs. Sources are chosen for your sector and requirements — and every source is monitored for health and reliability, so collection stays a resource you can account for.
Collected intelligence becomes finished reports — situation, assessment, recommendations — tied back to the PIRs they answer, with every factual claim traceable to its source. Not a wall of indicators; answers to the questions you asked.
Reports route to the teams and stakeholders who need them — by attack vector, by group, on their terms — with a logged trail of who was told what, and when. Intelligence that stays in a dashboard didn't happen.
A source count is easy to put on a slide. Keeping those sources actually flowing — and knowing when they aren't — is the harder part, and it's what separates managed collection from a subscription.
Feeds move, change format, or go quiet. Conundrum monitors the health of every collection source and flags degradation — so a silently broken feed never becomes a silent gap in your intelligence.
Because collection is driven by dated, reviewable PIRs, you can always show what you prioritised, what was collected against it, and what was reported — the traceable trail regulators and auditors ask for.
Explore how the platform runs the cycle end to end, or talk to the team about your organisation's requirements.