Your team writes intelligence, they don't just read it, and what the platform generates is checked before it reaches anyone.
before publication, every factual assertion is matched back to where it came from
weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual
held reports stay held until a person reviews them
Write original reports with full version history, analyst notes and locking. Every publication takes an immutable snapshot, so readers see a stable version.
Collected intelligence becomes situation, assessment and recommendations, then is scored against its own sources. Reports asserting what those sources do not support are held for review rather than published.
Upload a third-party PDF and have it structured into your own report format instead of retyping it.
Weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual summaries, each carrying a section built from your own team’s activity: your watchlist hits, your triage, your published intel.
A generated report that asserts a CVE its sources never mention is worse than no report, because it is confident and wrong. Holding those for review costs us volume and is the single thing we would least like to remove.
The fastest way to judge an intelligence platform is to point it at what you actually need to know.
